August 2023 LIP of the Month

Multiple magma pulses during the main stage of the Greater Kerguelen mantle plume/LIP: evidence from Early Cretaceous mafic dykes of the Chhota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane, eastern Indian Shield

Rajesh K. Srivastava1*, Fei Wang2, Wenbei Shi2 and Richard E. Ernst3

1Centre of Advanced Study in Geology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India

2State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China

3Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S5B6, Canada

*Corresponding author’s e-mail: rajeshgeolbhu@gmail.com

Extracted and updated from

Srivatava, Rajesh K., Wang, F., Shi, W. and Ernst, R.E. (2023). Early Cretaceous mafic dykes from the Chhota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane, eastern India: evidence of multiple magma pulses for the main stage of the Greater Kerguelen mantle plume. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 241, 105464; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105464

and

Srivastava, Rajesh K. (2022). Early Cretaceous Greater Kerguelen large igneous province and its plumbing systems: a contemplation on concurrent magmatic records of the eastern Indian Shield and adjoining regions. Geological Journal, 57, 681-693; DOI: 10.1002/gj.4239

ABSTRACT

A number Early Cretaceous (mostly emplaced between ca. 145 and 100 Ma) magmatic rocks are recorded in south-eastern Tibet, eastern and north-eastern India, western Australia, Eastern Indian Ocean, southern Kerguelen Plateau, and north-eastern Antarctica regions, which are collectively considered to be related with the Kerguelen mantle plume and identified as the Greater Kerguelen Large Igneous Province. Their likely connection with the break-up of East Gondwana is also well-established. Broadly, two major magmatic phases are identifiedfrom ca. 145 to 130 Ma (initial stage), between ca. 124 and 100 Ma (main stage). A third phase (plume tail) is also recorded between ca. 100 Ma and present day.

The Chhota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane (CNGT) of the eastern Indian Shield includes units related to the main stage (ca. 124-100 Ma) of the Greater Kerguelen mantle plume. These include ca. 118-102 Ma Rajmahal tholeiite basaltic flows, ca. 118-109 Ma dolerite dykes, and ca. 114-113 Ma high-potassic dykes. Herein, the genetic aspects of Early Cretaceous NNW- to WNW-trending dolerite dykes, identified as the Raniganj-Koderma swarm, are discussed for their likely connection to the Kerguelen mantle plume. Combining 40Ar/39Ar dates and geochemical data on these dykes helped to identify three distinct magma pulses, which are emplaced ca. 118-116 Ma, ca. 112-111 Ma, and ca. 109 Ma. Their geochemical characteristics clearly suggest that these were derived from OIB – E-MORB type mantle melts, which is likely to be generated due to interaction of a plume with a spreading ridge.

Keywords: Early Cretaceous; dolerite dykes; Ar40-Ar39 date; Geochemistry, Greater Kerguelen LIP; Eastern India.

Introduction

A number of mantle plume induced intraplate Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) are identified in the Indian Shield throughout the Earth’s history; mostly derived from mantle melts (e.g., Ernst and Srivastava, 2008; Ernst, 2014; Samal et al., 2019, 2021; Srivastava, 2020a,b, 2022; Srivastava et al., 2022 and references therein). The age of these LIPs range from Precambrian (oldest ca. 3.35-3.34 Ga – Sargur LIP; Samal et al., 2021) to Phanerozoic – mostly Cretaceous (youngest ca. 66.0-65.5 Ma – Deccan LIP; cf. Courtillot et al., 1988; Chenet et al., 2007; Hooper et al., 2010).

Amongst the two notable Cretaceous LIP events recorded in the Indian Shield, i.e., the Early Cretaceous Greater Kerguelen LIP (e.g., Kent et al., 2002; Coffin et al., 2002; Srivastava et al., 2020, 2023; Srivastava, 2022) and the Late Cretaceous (-Paleocene) Deccan LIP (e.g., Courtillot et al., 1988; Chenet et al., 2007; Hooper et al., 2010), the former dominates in the eastern and north-eastern region of the Indian Shield (see Fig. 1). Early Cretaceous magmatic rocks, ranging in composition from ultrapotassic-alkaline-carbonatite to mafic-ultramafic, are well exposed in the Chhota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane (CNGT; the eastern region) and Shillong Plateau (north-eastern region) (Fig. 1; see Table 1 for more details; cf. Srivastava, 2020a, 2022).


Figure 1: (a) Simplified geological map of the eastern and north-eastern regions of the Indian Shield (modified after Bhowmik et al., 2012; Srivastava, 2020a, 2022). CNGT – Chota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane; CHB – Chhattisgarh Basin; DV – Dalma volcanics; EGMB – Eastern Ghats Mobile Belt; MH – Mikir Hills; RTB – Rajmahal tholeiitic basalt; SGC – Singhbhum Granite Complex; SMB – Singhbhum Mobile Belt; SP – Shillong Plateau; STB – Sylhet tholeiitic basalt; VB – Vindhyan Basin. (b) Generalized geological sketch map of the Shillong Plateau (and Mikir Hills) showing locations of alkaline, mafic, ultramafic, carbonatite occurrences (modified after Melluso et al., 2012; Srivastava et al., 2019; Srivastava, 2020a). (c) Geological map of part of the CNGT showing distribution of distinct mafic dykes (after Srivastava et al., 2014, 2020a,b; 2023). Red stars show 40Ar/39Ar geochronology samples. CHB: Chhattisgarh Basin; RTB: Rajmahal tholeiitic basalt; SGC: Singhbhum Granite Complex; NPSZ: North Purulia shear zone; SPSZ: South Purulia shear zone; SSZ: Singhbhum shear zone; VB – Vindhyan Basin. F – F: Fault; A to E – Gondwana sedimentary basins (A: Karanpura; B: Bokaro; C: Jharia; D: Raniganj; E: Mahanadi).

These different magmatic units are derived from distinct mantle melts and can be separated in space and time (e.g., Ray and Pande, 2001; Kent et al., 2002; Coffin et al., 2002; Ray et al., 2005; Ghatak and Basu, 2011, 2013; Srivastava et al., 2005, 2014, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023; Srivastava, 2020a,b, 2022), however all of them are connected, directly or indirectly, with the second (main) phase of Kerguelen plume event (see Srivastava, 2022, Srivastava et al., 2023 for review).

The CNGT encompasses Early Cretaceous basaltic flows and dykes which are thought to be part of the Kerguelen plume activities; these include the ca. 118-103 Ma Rajmahal tholeiite basaltic (RTB) flows (e.g., Kent et al., 2002; Coffin et al., 2002) and the ca. 118-109 Ma NNW- to WNW-trending dolerite dykes (see Fig. 1 and Table 1; Srivastava, 2022; Srivastava et al., 2023). Here we present a detailed discussion on all the available 40Ar/39Ar geochronological and geochemical data on the ca. 118-109 Ma NNW- to WNW-trending dolerite dykes to decipher their genetic aspects and connection with the Kerguelen mantle plume and, by inference, the Greater Kerguelen LIP.

Table 1: Early Cretaceous magmatic rocks of the eastern and north-eastern region of the Indian Shield and spatially associated to the Greater Kerguelen LIP (updated from Srivastava, 2020, 2022; Srivastava et al., 2023).

The Chhota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane, eastern India [including Rajmahal basalts (RB)].

 

Location

Dated rock/mineral

Age (2σ) in Ma

Method

Reference

1.

Gadikalan, Koderma

Dolerite dyke/whole-rock

118.3 ± 1.3

Ar/Ar Plateau

Srivastava et al. (2023)

2.

Kunda Pahar, RB

Basalt/plagioclase

118.1 ± 0.6

Ar/Ar Plateau

Coffin et al. (2002)

3.

Dhanbad, RB

Basalt/whole-rock

117.9 ± 0.4

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

4.

RB

Basalt/whole-rock

117.5 ± 0.5

Ar/Ar Plateau

Baksi (1995)

5.

Mirza Cauki, RB

Basalt/whole-rock

117.4 ± 0.5

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

6.

Galsi, Bengal Basin

Basalt/whole-rock

117.1 ± 0.4

Ar/Ar Plateau

Baksi (1995)

7.

Jalangi, Bengal Basin

Basalt/whole-rock

116.9 ± 2.3

Ar/Ar Plateau

Baksi (1995)

8.

RB

Basalt/whole-rock

116.2 ± 0.6

Ar/Ar Plateau

Pringle et al. (1994)

9.

Chinchuria, Salma

Dolerite dyke/whole-rock

116.0 ± 1.4

Ar/Ar Plateau

Srivastava et al. (2020)

10.

Meghatari, Koderma

Dolerite dyke/whole-rock

115.3 ± 0.4

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

11.

Mahadeogan, RB

Basalt/whole-rock

115.3 ± 0.6

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

12.

Bokaro basin

Lamproite dyke/phlogopite

114.4 ± 0.1

Ar/Ar Plateau

Ghatak and Basu (2013)

13.

Damodar Valley

Orangeites/whole-rock

113.5 ± 0.5

Ar-Ar laser probe

Kent et al. (1998)

14.

Kalidaspur, Raniganj

Dolerite dyke/whole-rock

112.5 ± 0.5

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

15.

Mirza Cauki, RB

Basalt/whole-rock

112.2 ± 0.5

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

16.

Gurha, Giridih

Dolerite dyke/whole-rock

111.8 ± 1.5

Ar/Ar Plateau

Srivastava et al. (2023)

17.

Paharpur, Koderma

Dolerite dyke/whole-rock

110.9 ± 1.5

Ar/Ar Plateau

Srivastava et al. (2023)

18.

Sitalpur, RB

Basalt/whole-rock

109.6 ± 0.8

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

19.

Raghunathchak, Raniganj

Dolerite dyke/whole-rock

109.0 ± 1.9

Ar/Ar Plateau

Srivastava et al. (2023)

20.

Lalmatia, RB

Basalt/whole-rock

105.0 ± 0.5

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

21.

Gogra Hill, RB

Basalt/whole-rock

102.8 ± 1.8

Ar/Ar Plateau

Kent et al. (2002)

 

The Shillong Plateau, north-eastern India (including Sylhet Traps).

 

Location

Dated rock/mineral

Age (2σ) in Ma

Method

Reference

1.

Sylhet

Basalt/whole-rock

116.0 ± 3.5

Ar/Ar Plateau

Ray et al. (2005)

2.

Sung Valley

Ijolite/perovskite

115.1 ± 5.1

U-Pb ID-TIMS

Srivastava et al. (2005)

3.

Swangkre (?)

Lamprophyre/biotite

114.9 ± 0.6

Ar/Ar Plateau

Coffin et al. (2002)

4.

Sylhet

Basalt/whole-rock

110.0 ± 3

K-Ar

Sarkar et al. (1996)

5.

Sung Valley

Dunite/perovskite

109.1 ± 1.6

In situ U-Pb SIMS

Srivastava et al. (2019)

6.

Sung Valley

Pyroxenite/whole-rock

108.8 ± 2

Ar/Ar Plateau

Ray and Pande (2001)

7.

Sung Valley

Carbonatite/phlogopite

107.5 ± 1.4

Ar/Ar Plateau

Ray and Pande (2001)

8.

Sung Valley

Pyroxenite/whole-rock & carbonatite/phlogopite

107.2 ± 0.8

Ar/Ar Plateau

Ray et al. (1999)

9.

Swangkre

Lamprophyre/whole-rock

107.0 ± 4

K-Ar

Sarkar et al. (1996)

10.

Jasra

Syenite/zircon

106.8 ± 0.8

In situ U-Pb SIMS

Srivastava et al. (2019)

11.

Sung Valley

Nepheline syenite/zircon

106.8 ± 1.5

In situ U-Pb SIMS

Srivastava et al. (2019)

12.

Sung Valley

Carbonatite/phlogopite

106.4 ± 1.3

Ar/Ar Plateau

Ray and Pande (2001)

13.

Jasra

Gabbro/zircon and baddeleyite

105.2 ± 0.5

U-Pb ID-TIMS

Heaman et al. (2002)

14.

Sung Valley

Ijolite/perovskite

104.0 ± 1.3

In situ U-Pb SIMS

Srivastava et al. (2019)

15.

Sung Valley

Uncompahgrite/perovskite

101.7 ± 3.6

In situ U-Pb SIMS

Srivastava et al. (2019)

16.

Jasra

Clinopyroxenite/perovskite

101.6 ± 1.2

In situ U-Pb SIMS

Srivastava et al. (2019)

Table 2: Range of emplacement ages of Early Cretaceous mafic, felsic and alkaline magmatic rocks related to the Greater Kerguelen Large Igneous Province, Eastern Gondwana (after Srivastava, 2022).

 

Territory

First leading phase

(Ca. 145-130 Ma)

Second leading phase

(Ca. 124-100 Ma)

1.

Eastern Tethyan Himalaya

Ca. 147-130 Ma

Ca. 121-116 Ma

2.

Eastern Lesser Himalaya, India

Ca. 135-130 Ma

Ca. 121 Ma

3.

Bunbury, Western Australia

Ca. 137-130 Ma

Ca. 123 Ma

4.

Eastern Indian Ocean

Ca. 132-127 Ma

Ca. 124-101 Ma

5.

Shillong Plateau

No record

Ca. 116-102 Ma

6.

Chhotanagpur Gneissic Complex

No record

Ca. 118-103 Ma

7.

Southern Kerguelen Plateau

No record

Ca. 119-110 Ma

8.

Eastern Antarctica

No Record

Ca. 122-110 Ma

Geology of the CNGT

The CNGT is considered to be part of the Singhbhum craton; separated from the Singhbhum Granite Complex (SGC) by the Singhbhum Mobile Belt (SMB) (e.g., Naqvi and Rogers, 1987; Sharma, 2009; Srivastava et al., 2009, 2012, 2014, 2020; see Fig. 1a). The major part of the CNGT comprises Precambrian basement rocks (granite gneisses, migmatites, porphyritic granite and metasedimentary enclaves), Gondwana sedimentary basins, Rajmahal tholeiitic basalts, and mafic dykes of different ages (e.g., Naqvi and Rogers, 1987; Mahadevan, 2002; Kent et al., 2002; Sharma, 2009; Ramakrishnan and Vaidyanadhan, 2010; Srivastava, 2020a,b, Srivastava et al., 2014, 2020 and references therein). There is debate over nature of the CNGT as many thought that it is a Proterozoic mobile belt (e.g., Mukhopadhyay, 1988; Mahadevan, 2002; Ghose and Chatterjee, 2008), and others considered that it was a mobile belt that cratonized by the end of Archean (e.g., Naqvi and Rogers, 1987; Kumar and Ahmad, 2007; Sharma, 2009; Srivastava et al., 2009, 2012, 2020). Based on various lines of geological evidence, which include the presence of komatiite magmatism (Bhattacharya et al., 2010), Cretaceous potassic intrusions (Srivastava et al., 2009; Chalapathi Rao et al., 2014; Srivastava, 2020a), Mesoproterozoic to Cretaceous mafic dykes (Kumar and Ahmad, 2007; Srivastava et al., 2012, 2014, 2020, 2023, Srivastava, 2022), and post-Archean ENE– to E–trending intra-continental rift/shear zones (e.g., Ghose and Chatterjee, 2008), the present authors also believed that the CNGT is an Archean block whose convergence with the Singhbhum craton in the south gave rise to the Singhbhum mobile belt and medium-grade enclaves of meta-sediments and basic rocks.

Mafic dykes of different ages, ranging from Mesoproterzoic (Kumar and Ahmad, 2007; Srivastava et al., 2012) to Late Cretaceous (Srivastava et al., 2014, 2020, 2023), are emplaced within the CNGT (Fig. 1c). The Mesoproterozoic mafic dykes mostly trend in ENE to E and intruded the Precambrian basement gneisses, whereas Early Cretaceous dolerite dykes intrude the Gondwana sedimentary rocks as well as Precambrian basement rocks and trend NNW to WNW (Kent et al., 2002; Srivastava et al., 2014, 2020; 2023). On the other hand, a set of Late Cretaceous (ca. 70-65 Ma) dolerite dykes, which mostly trend in NNE to NE, intrude only the Gondwana sedimentary rocks (cf. Kent et al., 2002; Srivastava et al., 2014). The Early Cretaceous (ca. 118-109 Ma) NNW- to WNW-trending dolerite dykes, identified as the Raniganj-Koderma swarm (Srivastava et al., 2023) are well exposed in and around the Raniganj, Giridih and Koderma regions (Fig. 1c). Although dolerite dykes encountered around the Raniganj region and intrude the Gondwana sedimentary rocks, including coal beds. However an NNW-trending dolerite dyke (>50 km long; identified as the Salma dyke) extends into the Precambrian basement rocks as well. In contrast, dolerite dykes in the Giridih and Koderma areas intrude only Precambrian basement rocks.

A number of studied Early Cretaceous dolerite dykes are traced in length from a kilometre to tens of kilometres (Fig. 1c); the longest one is >50 km long Salma dyke (Kent et al., 2002; Paul, 2005). Srivastava et al. (2023) have named some individual longer dykes; these are – the >20 km long NW-trending Paharpur dyke exposed in the Koderma area, the >15 km long NW-trending Gurha dyke encountered from the Giridih area, the >5 km long WNW-trending Gadikalan exposed in the Koderma area, and the ~5 km long N-S trending Raghunathchak dykes encountered from the Raniganj area. The Raghunathchak dyke is reported to cut the NNW-trending Salma dyke near Raghunathchak, indicating its younger emplacement age. Mostly these dykes are medium- to coarse-grained and possess ophitic/sub-ophitic textures and chiefly consist of subhedral grains of augite/titan augite and plagioclase (An80-65); ilmenite (up to 10 vol%), orthopyroxene and a few grains of rutile and apatite are present as accessory phases.

Results

40Ar/39Ar Dating

Total seven dykes from the Raniganj-Koderma swarm were dated with 40Ar/39Ar method (see Table 1; Kent et al., 2002; Srivastava et al., 2020, 2023). Kent et al. (2002) have dated two dolerite dyke samples, one from the Koderma area that yielded plateau date of 115.3 ± 0.4 Ma and other from the Kalidaspur area which yielded plateau date of 112.5 ± 0.5 Ma. Later, Srivastava et al. (2020) dated a dyke sample from the Chinchuria area, a part of the Salma dyke, which yielded plateau date of 116.0 ± 1.4 Ma. Recently, Srivastava et al. (2023) dated four samples from the Raniganj-Koderma swarm; these include (i) a dolerite sample from the WNW-trending Gadikalan dyke, Koderma which yielded plateau date of 118.3 ± 1.3 Ma, (ii) a dolerite sample from the Koderma area collected from the NW-trending Paharpur dyke which yielded a plateau date of 110.9 ± 1.5 Ma, (iii) a dolerite sample from the NW-trending Gurha dyke which yielded a plateau date of 111.8 ± 1.5 Ma, and (iv) a dolerite sample from the N-S dolerite dyke that cuts the NNW-trending Salma dyke near Raghunathchak, in the Raniganj area and which yielded a plateau date of 109.0 ± 1.9 Ma.

Geochemistry

Available geochemical data on dolerite dykes of the Raniganj-Koderma swarm (Srivastava et al., 2014, 2020, 2023); are examined to evaluate their geochemical characteristics. Their sub-alkaline tholeiitic basaltic andesite nature is observed for all the samples (Fig. 2a; Le Maitre, 2002), which is further substantiated on the Jensen’s cation plot where most samples plot in the high-Mg tholeiitic field (Fig. 2b; Jensen, 1976).


Figure 2: (a) Total-alkali silica (TAS) diagram, plotted on an anhydrous basis (after Le Maitre, 2002). The thick blue dotted line separates sub-alkaline basalts from alkaline basalts (after Irvine and Baragar, 1971). (b) Jensen’s cation plot (after Jensen, 1976).

Selected high-field strength elements (HFSEs) are examined for their variation against MgO (see Fig. 3). All plotted HFSE increase with increasing MgO contents following a normal trend of crystallization. It is observed that apart from Y and Yb all other HFSEs variation diagrams dyke samples plot in two distinct groups, each having their own course of crystallization. Also, a group of dyke samples (mostly from the dykes in the Raniganj area) have higher contents of HFSEs than the other group (dykes in the Giridih and Koderma areas) with overlapping MgO contents. Similar results are observed on variation of HFSEs (Ti, P, Y, and Nd) plotted with respect to Zr contents (Fig. 4). All the HFSEs have positive correlation and each of the two groups follow its own distinct crystallization path.


Figure 3: Geochemical variations between MgO (wt%) and a few selected high-field strength elements (HFSEs). Arrows shown signify fractionation trends and two grey thick line show different HFSEs levels with respect to overlapping MgO contents.


Figure 4: Geochemical variation between Zr and a few selected high-field strength elements (HFSEs). Arrows shown signify fractionation trends. 40Ar/39Ar ages are also marked for the dated samples.

40Ar/39Ar ages of the dated samples (filled circles) are marked for more clear picture. The correlation between geochemical and age suggest that the WNW- and NNW-trending ca. 118-116 Ma dyke samples have different geochemical characteristics and follow distinct crystallization path from the NW-trending ca. 112-111 Ma dyke samples. Interestingly, the N-S trending ca. 109 Ma dyke sample shows similar chemistry to the ca. 118-116 Ma dyke samples.

On the primordial mantle normalized multi-element (ME) and chondrite normalized rare-earth element (REE) patterns all the studied samples show elemental compositions which are more enriched than primordial mantle and chondrite values (Fig. 5). In general, all samples show noticeable negative Nb-Ta, Th and positive Ba, Sr anomalies on ME diagrams (Fig. 5a-c). A very small negative Ti and no significant anomaly in Zr-Hf is noticed in all samples as well.


Figure 5: Primordial mantle-normalized multi-element (a–c) and chondrite normalized rare-earth element (d–f) patterns for the ca. 118–109 Ma dolerite dyke samples of the CNGT. 40Ar/39Ar ages are also marked for the dated samples. Primordial mantle and chondrite values are from McDonough et al. (1992) and Evensen et al. (1978), respectively.

The ca. 118-116 Ma (Fig. 5a) and ca. 109 Ma (Fig. 5c) dyke samples have a smaller Nb-Ta trough than the ca. 112-111 Ma samples (Fig. 5b). Also two former groups of samples show a wider variation in the Rb and Sr than the third, youngest group. Inclined REE trends (Fig. 5d-f), (light-REE (LREE) enriched relative to heavy-REE (HREE)) is noticed for all the studied samples, however, the ca. 118-116 Ma and ca. 109 Ma samples show slightly enriched middle REE (MREE) abundances (Fig. 5d, f), which is not observed in the ca. 112-111 Ma samples (Fig. 5e).

Pearce et al. (2021) have used immobile element proxies to characterize LIPs and understand the petrogenetic processes involved. They suggested a LIP printing diagram based on the Th/Nb – Ti/Yb ratio variations in LIP samples (Fig. 6c) that essentially combines the two earlier projections, i.e., Th/Yb – Nb/Yb (Fig. 6a; Pearce, 2008) and TiO2/Yb – Nb/Yb (Fig. 6b; Pearce, 2008), in order to distinguish different geochemical types of LIPs. All the studied dolerite dyke samples plot close to the Type IIIab array that defines the MORB-OPB-OIB – SZLM characteristics; however, they plot closer to MORB-OPB-OIB rather than to SZLM (see Fig. 6c). The Kerguelen plume derived basalts, which are supposed to be part of the Greater Kerguelen LIP (e.g., Yang et al., 1998; Doucet et al., 2002; Frey et al., 2002), are also shown on this plot (see Fig. 6c); the studied samples show close similarities with these basalts.

Discussion

40Ar/39Ar ages and Geochemistry

All the available 40Ar/39Ar dates are precise and considered as emplacement ages for the dolerite dykes of the Raniganj-Koderma swarm. The observed ages range from ca. 118 Ma to ca. 109 Ma, and suggest emplacement of dolerite dykes in three pulses (ca. 118-116 Ma, ca. 112-111 Ma, and ca. 109 Ma). The Early Cretaceous Rajmahal tholeiitic basaltic flows are also emplaced during ca. 118-103 Ma (see Table 1) in the CNGT and are thought to be contemporaneous with the Raniganj-Koderma swarm. Based on geochemical characters, the studied Early Cretaceous dolerite dykes (Raniganj-Koderma swarm) are classified into three distinct groups, i.e., ca. 118-116 Ma, ca. 112-111 Ma, and ca. 109 Ma. The ca. 118-116 Ma group consists of ca. 116 Ma Raniganj dolerite dykes and the ca. 118 Ma Gadikalan dyke (of the Koderma area) and they follow the same Geochemical Trend 1 and are considered to represent one pulse with trend WNW-NNW. The other group comprises samples from the ca. 112-111 Ma (mostly from the Giridih and Koderma areas), which follow Geochemical Trend 2 and are considered to represent a second pulse with trend NW. The third group represented by the ca. 109 Ma Raghunathchak dyke, which follows the Geochemical Trend 1, but since it was emplaced later then it is considered as a third pulse with trend N-S (see Fig. 4 for more details).

Most of the studied samples show negative Nb-Ta and positive Sr anomalies (Fig. 5a-c) which indicate a limited role of interaction with crustal components. However, no sample shows any Zr anomaly, and this observation does not support any role of crustal components as crustally contaminated samples should have positive anomalies. Furthermore, crustally contaminated samples should also show enriched LREE and flat HREE patterns (cf. Cullers and Graf, 1984; Hirschmann et al., 1998). However, all the studied samples show inclined REE patterns (Fig. 5d-f), which support crystallization of a rock from a low-percentage partial mantle melt, rather than from any crustal contamination (cf. Cullers and Graf, 1984; Fram and Lesher, 1993; Hirschmann et al., 1998).

Critical trace-element ratios (Th/Yb, Nb/Yb, TiO2/Yb, and Th/Nb,) are also tested to examine a possible role for contamination by crustal components. The low Th/Yb ratio is not consistent with any significant contribution of crustal components, either through crustal contamination or addition of crustal components from metasomatized lithospheric mantle (cf. Pearce, 2008; Pearce et al., 2021). On the Th/Yb vs Nb/Yb ratios plot (Fig. 6a), the studied samples show closer match with OIB – E-MORB rather than N-MORB. This plot can be used to evaluate the possible role of contamination by crustal components, whether by crustal contamination in crustal magma chambers (e.g., Pearce, 2008; Neumann et al., 2011), and/or by interaction by asthenospheric/plume melts with lithosphere previously metasomatized during a prior subduction event (e.g., Cai et al., 2010; Ernst, 2014; Pearce et al., 2021). Furthermore, on the Nb/Yb – TiO2/Yb ratio plot (Fig. 6b), studied samples shows an identical nature and plot at the transition of OIB and MORB arrays and indicate involvement of plume-ridge interaction in their genesis. All these characteristics clearly support an association with hotspot or plume and with at most only minor addition of crustal components (e.g., Schilling, 1973; Pearce et al., 2021).


Figure 6: (a) Nb/Yb versus Th/Yb projection representing crustal input proxy (Pearce, 2008; Pearce et al., 2021). The MORB-OIB-OPB and IAB arrays are also shown. (b) Nb/Yb versus TiO2/Yb projection representing residual garnet proxy (Pearce, 2008; Pearce et al., 2021). It also shows OIB (deep melting) and MORB (shallow melting) arrays. (c) The LIP printing diagram using both proxies. Subduction-modified lithospheric mantle array (SZLM; Type II LIP) and plume array (Type I LIP) are shown as well (Pearce et al., 2021). Type III LIP represent arrays due to plume-SZLM interactions (Type IIIa: interaction between SZLM and MORB-OPB; Type b: interaction between SZLM and OIB-OPB; and Type IIIab: interaction between SZLM and MORB-OIB-OPB). Field of the Kerguelen basalts associated to the Kerguelen LIP is also shown for comparison.

Linkage to the Greater Kerguelen Mantle Plume and Large Igneous Province

The incompatible trace element geochemical characteristics of the Early Cretaceous Raniganj-Koderma dolerite dyke swarm from the CNGT clearly suggest their emplacement in an intraplate setting and association with a mantle plume; they show OIB – E-MORB nature rather than N-MORB.

The Greater Kerguelen LIP covers a huge area consisting of the Eastern Tibetan Tethyan Himalaya, Eastern Indian Lesser Himalaya, Western Australia, Eastern Indian Ocean, Shillong Plateau (NE India), Chota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane (Eastern India), southern Kerguelen Plateau, and north-eastern Antarctica (cf. Zhu et al., 2009; Whittaker et al., 2016; Olierook et al., 2019; Srivastava, 2020, 2022 and references therein). All these magmatic rocks are supposed to be connected to the Kerguelen plume, spanning from ca. 145 Ma and continued until the present day at the Kerguelen Archipelago and Central Kerguelen Plateau in the Indian Ocean (cf. Weis et al., 2002; Patrick and Smellie, 2013; Duncan et al., 2016; Bredow and Steinberger, 2018). Largely, these magmatic activities (of the Kerguelen plume head stage) belong to two major phases – (i) between ca. 145 and 130 Ma, and (ii) between ca. 124 and 100 Ma (cf. Srivastava, 2022; see Table 2). The third phase (plume tail) is between ca. 100 Ma and present day (e.g., Coffin et al., 2002; Duncan, 2002; Bredow and Steinberger, 2018). These three phases of magmatic activities of the Kerguelen plume are further supported by the three distinct parts of the Kerguelen hotspot track (Doubrovine et al., 2012).

The ca. 118-109 Ma Raniganj-Koderma dolerite dyke swarm of the present study belongs to the second major phase (ca. 124 and 100 Ma; Srivastava, 2022). Figure 7 shows comparison of geochemical characteristics of the studied dykes with other second phase magmas and also with other Kerguelen plume derived basaltic rocks, including the Kerguelen plateau basalts (including Naturaliste plateau and Bunbury basalts; Salters et al., 1992; Mahoney et al., 1995; Frey et al., 1996), Rajmahal Group I and Group II tholeiitic basalts (Storey et al., 1992), and earlier studied Early Cretaceous low-Ti dolerite dykes (Srivastava et al., 2014). All the studied dykes of Raniganj-Koderma swarm show a good match with these Kerguelen plume related basaltic rocks. This supports their genetic connection with the Greater Kerguelen plume / LIP and in particular the second plume head stage. More specifically, their transitional nature between OIB and MORB fields with participation of plume-ridge interaction in their genesis is also noticed (Fig. 8c), which indicate only minor contribution of crustal components through interaction with metasomatized lithosphere.


Figure 7: Comparison of Early Cretaceous dolerite dyke samples of the present study with the Kerguelen plume derived basaltic rocks (Mahoney et al., 1995; Frey et al., 1996), Rajmahal Group I and Group II tholeiitic basalts (Storey et al., 1992), and earlier studied Early Cretaceous low-Ti dolerite dykes (Srivastava et al., 2014). Fields are taken from Kent et al. (1997). (a) Th/Ta versus La/Ta and (b) MgO versus Ti/Zr.


Figure 8: Plate reconstructions of East Gondwana. (a) ca. 137–130 Ma, (b) ca. 124–122 Ma, and (c) ca. 119– 100 Ma based on emplacement ages of different basic, felsic, alkaline and carbonatite rocks (Bian et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2018; Gibbons et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2019; Olierook et al., 2019; Srivastava, 2020, 2022; Whittaker et al., 2016; Zeng et al., 2019; and references therein). Abbreviations: BB-WA – Bunbury Basalts, Western Australia; CNGT – Chota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane; EAL – Eastern Antarctica lamprophyres; ETH – Eastern Tethyan Himalaya; ELH – Eastern Lesser Himalaya; NP-EIO – Naturaliste Plateau, Eastern Indian Ocean; PCK – Prince Charles kimberlites; SP – Shillong Plateau; SKP – Southern Kerguelen Plateau; WP – Wallaby Plateau. See text and Supporting Information for data source.

The Greater Kerguelen Mantle Plume and Break-up of East Gondwana

As stated in earlier section, two distinct mega events (rifting?), related to the Greater Kerguelen mantle plume have been identified; one starts ca. 145 Ma and ends ca. 130 Ma and the other begins ca. 124 Ma and was completed ca. 100 Ma. These events played a significant role in the break-up of East Gondwana (cf. Shi et al., 2018). Based on report of ca. 147 Ma andesitic flows in the Kada area in the Eastern Tethyan Himalaya (ETH), which shows plume component, it is suggested that the Kerguelen mantle plume arrived in the region at this time (cf. Shi et al., 2018). However, the major emplacement of earliest basaltic volcanism and dykes were observed during ca. 145–140 Ma in the south-eastern Tibet region (e.g., Zhu et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2019; Tian et al., 2019; Zeng et al., 2019; Bian et al., 2019). This was followed by ca. 137–135 Ma (OIB)-type basaltic magmatism in the entire ETH (e.g., Bian et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2019; Tian et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2008 and references therein); these have isotopic compositions similar to the Kerguelen Archipelago (e.g., Shi et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2008, 2009).

It is believed that during the period between ca. 145 and 135 Ma, the Kerguelen plume head was likely to have been located below northern Greater India (i.e., beneath the ETH and ELH; e.g., Doubrovine et al., 2012; Gibbons et al., 2013; Watson et al., 2016; Whittaker et al., 2013). This is well supported by geochemical signature of magmatic rocks of this region that show plume component in their genesis (Bian et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2019; Singh et al., 2020, 2021; Tian et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2008 and references therein). This was followed by several magmatic activities recorded during ca. 137–127 Ma in the ETH (e.g., Zhu et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2015; Wei et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018; Bian et al., 2019; Tian et al., 2019), ELS (Singh et al., 2020, 2021), Bunbury (e.g., Coffin et al., 2002; Olierook et al., 2016, 2019), and EIO (e.g., Direen et al., 2017; Olierook et al., 2017). These magmatic activities are likely to indicate break-up of East Gondwana ca. 137 Ma that initiated the separation of Western Australia from Greater India (see Fig. 8a). However, no such magmatic record of this period is known from the Shillong Plateau, CGC, Eastern Antarctica, and Kerguelen Plateau suggesting they were remained united at that time.

The next phase of magmatic activities, i.e., ca. 124–122 Ma, marked separation of Antarctica from Eastern India (Fig. 5b), which was followed by a number of mafic and alkaline (carbonatite) magmatism in the Shillong Plateau (e.g., Coffin et al., 2002; Heaman et al., 2002; Ray et al., 2005; Srivastava et al., 2005, 2019), CNGT (e.g., Baksi, 1995; Coffin et al., 2002; Ghatak and Basu, 2013; Kent et al., 2002; Srivastava, et al., 2020, 2023), Eastern Antarctica (e.g., Coffin et al., 2002; Yaxley et al., 2013), and the Kerguelen Plateau (e.g., Coffin et al., 2002; Duncan, 2002; Ingle et al., 2002) during ca. 119-110 Ma (Fig. 5c).

Conclusions

  • Available 40Ar/39Ar plateau dates of dolerite dyke samples from the Early Cretaceous N- to WNW-trending Raniganj-Koderma swarm, Chhota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane clearly suggest their emplacement during ca. 118-109 Ma.
  • 40Ar/39Ar dates and geochemistry of the studied dolerite dyke samples suggest their emplacement at least in three pulses: Pulse 1 – WNW- and NNW-trending ca. 118-116 Ma dykes following geochemical Trend 1; Pulse 2 – NW-trending ca. 112-111 Ma dykes following geochemical Trend 2; and Pulse 3 – N-S trending ca. 109 Ma dykes with geochemical Trend 1.
  • Geochemically the studied dyke samples show a close match with the MORB–OIB-OPB array suggesting their mantle nature. The characteristic geochemical nature suggests close similarities with the Type IIIab LIP array on the LIP fingerprinting classification (Pearce et al., 2021).
  • The ca. 118-109 Ma Raniganj-Koderma dolerite dyke swarm of the present study belongs to the second plume head phase of the Greater Kerguelen mantle plume / LIP.
  • The spatial and temporal distribution of Early Cretaceous (ca. 145– 100 Ma) magmatic rocks exposed within the continental blocks associated to East Gondwana are likely to be connected, directly or indirectly, with the Kerguelen mantle plume and suggest their LIP nature. Their crucial role in the break-up of East Gondwana is also emphasized.

Acknowledgements

RKS thanks the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) for financial support through a research project (no. EMR/2016/000169). Authors thanks the head of the Department of Geology, Banaras Hindu University and the Director, State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, for extending all necessary facilities required during this work.

References

Baksi, A.K., 1995. Petrogenesis and timing of volcanism in the Rajmahal flood basalt province, northeastern India. Chemical Geology, 121, 73-90.

Bhattacharya, D.K., Mukherjee, D., Barla, V.C., 2010. Komatiite within Chhotanagpur Gneissic Complex at Semra, Palamau district, Jharkhand: Petrological and geochemical fingerprints. J. Geol. Soc. India 76, 589–606.

Bhowmik, S.K., Wilde, S.A., Bhandari, A., Pal, T. and Pant, N.C., 2012. Growth of the Greater Indian Landmass and its assembly in Rodinia: geochronological evidence from the Central Indian Tectonic Zone. Gondwana Research, 22, 54–72.

Bian, W., Yang, T., Ma, Y., Jin, J., Gao, F., Wang, S., Peng, W., Zhang, S., Wu, H., Li, H., Cao, L. and Shi, Y., 2019. Paleomagnetic and geochronological results from the Zhela and Weimei Formations lava flows of the eastern Tethyan Himalaya: New insights into the breakup of eastern Gondwana. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124, 44-64.

Bredow, E., Steinberger, B., 2018. Variable melt production rate of the Kerguelen hotspot due to long-term plume-ridge interaction. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 126-136.

Cai, K., Sun, M., Yuan, C., Zhao, G., Xiao, W., Long, X., Wu, F., 2010. Geochronological and geochemical study of mafic dkes from the northwest Chinese Altai: implications for petrogenesis and tectonic evolution. Gond. Res. 18, 638–652.

Chalapathi Rao, N.V., Srivastava, R.K., Sinha, A.K., Ravikant, V., 2014. Petrogenesis of Kerguelen mantle plume-linked Early Cretaceous ultrapotassic intrusive rocks from the Gondwana sedimentary basins, Damodar Valley, Eastern India. Earth Sci. Rev. 136, 96–120.

Chen, S.-S., Fan, W.-M., Shi, R.-D., Liu, X.-H. & Zhou, X.-J., 2018. 118–115 Ma magmatism in the Tethyan Himalaya igneous province: Constraints on Early Cretaceous rifting of the northern margin of Greater India. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 491, 21-33.

Chenet, A.L., Quidelleur, X., Fluteau, F., Courtillot, V., 2007. 40K–39Ar dating of the main Deccan large igneous province: Further evidence of KTB age and short duration. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 263, 1–15.

Coffin, M.F., Pringle, M.S., Duncan, R.A., Gladezenko, T.P., Storey, M., Mqller, R.D., Gahagan, L.A., 2002. Kerguelen hotspot magma output since 130 Ma. J. Petrol. 43, 1121–1139.

Courtillot, V., Féraud G., Maluski, H., Vandamme, D., Moreau, M.G., Besse, J., 1988. Deccan flood basalts and the Cretaceous/tertiary boundary. Nature 333, 843–846.

Cullers, R.L., Graf, J.L., 1984. Rare earth elements in igneous rocks of the continental crust: predominantly basic and ultrabasic rocks. In: Henderson, P. (Ed.), Rare Earth Element Geochemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.237-274.

Direen, N., Cohen, B E., Maas, R., Frey, F.A., Whittaker, J.M., Coffin, M.F., Meffre, S., Halpin, J.A. and Crawford, A.J., 2017. Naturaliste Plateau: constraints on the timing and evolution of the Kerguelen Large Igneous province and its role in Gondwana breakup. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 64, 851-869.

Doubrovine, P.V., Steinberger, B., Torsvik, T.H., 2012. Absolute plate motions in a reference frame defined by moving hot spots in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B09101.

Doucet, S., Weis, D., Scoates, J.S., Nicolaysen, K., Frey, F.A., Giret, A., 2002. The depleted mantle component in Kerguelen archipelago basalts: petrogenesis of tholeiitic–transitional basalts from the Loranchet Peninsula. J. Petrol. 43, 1341–1366.

Duncan, R.A., 2002. A time frame for construction of the Kerguelen Plateau and Broken Ridge. J. Petrol. 43, 1109–1119.

Duncan, R.A., Falloon, T.J., Quilty, P.G., Coffin, M.F., 2016. Widespread Neogene volcanism on central Kerguelen Plateau, southern Indian Ocean. Australian J. Earth Sci. 63, 379–392.

Ernst, R.E., 2014. Large Igneous Provinces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Ernst, R.E. and Srivastava, R.K., 2008. India’s place in the Proterozoic world: constraints from the Large Igneous Province (LIP) record. In: Srivastava, R. K., Sivaji, C. & Chalapathi Rao, N.V. (Eds.), Indian Dyke: Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geochronology. Narosa Publ. House Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 413–445.

Evensen, N.M., Hamilton, P.J., O'nions, R.K., 1978. Rare–earth abundances in chondritic meteorites. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 1199–1212.

Fram, M.S., Lesher, C.E., 1993. Geochemical constraints on mantle melting during creation of the North Atlantic basin. Nature 363, 712–715.

Frey, F.A., McNaughton, N.J., Nelson, D.R., deLaeter, J.R., Duncan, R.A., 1996. Petrogenesis of Bunbury basalts, western Australia: interaction between the Kerguelen plume and Gondwana lithosphere? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 141, 163–183.

Frey, F.A.,Weis, D., Borisova, A.Y., Xu, G., 2002. Involvement of continental crust in the formation of the Cretaceous Kerguelen Plateau: new perspectives from ODP Leg 120 Sites. J. Petrol. 43, 1207–1239.

Ghatak, A., Basu, A.R., 2011. The Sylhet Traps: vestiges of the Kerguelen plume in NE India. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 308, 52–64.

Ghatak, A., Basu, A.R., 2013. Isotopic and trace element geochemistry of alkalic–mafic–ultramafic–carbonatitic complexes and flood basalts in NE India: Origin in a heterogeneous Kerguelen plume. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 115, 46–72.

Ghose, N.C., Chatterjee, N., 2008. Petrology, tectonic setting and source of dykes and related magmatic bodies in Chotanagpur gneissic complex, eastern India. In: Srivastava, R.K., Sivaji, C., Chalapathi Rao, N.V. (Eds.), Indian Dykes: Geochemistry, Geophysics and Geochronology. Narosa Publishing House Pvt Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 471-493.

Gibbons, A.D., Whittaker, J.M. and Muller, R.D., 2013. The breakup of East Gondwana: assimilating constraints from Cretaceous Ocean basins around India into a best-fit tectonic model. Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 118, 808–822.

Heaman, L.M., Srivastava, R.K. and Sinha, A.K., 2002. A precise U-Pb zircon/baddeleyite age for the Jasra igneous complex, Karbi-Analong District, Assam, NE India. Current Science, 82, 744-748.

Hirschmann, M.M., Ghiorso, M.S., Wasylenki, L.E., Asimow, P.D., Stolper, E.M., 1998. Calculation of peridotite partial melting from thermodynamic models of minerals and melts. I. Review of methods and comparison with experiments. J. Petrol. 39, 1091–1115.

Hooper, P.R., Widdowson, M., Kelley, S.P., 2010. Tectonic setting and timing of the final Deccan flood basalt eruptions. Geology 38, 839–842.

Huang, Y., Zhang, L., Liang, W., Li, G., Dong, S., Wu, J. and Xia, X., 2019. Petrogenesis of the Early Cretaceous Kada igneous rocks from Tethyan Himalaya: Implications for initial break‐up of eastern Gondwana. Geological Journal, 54, 1294-1346.

Ingle, S., Weis, D. and Frey, F.A., 2002. Indian continental crust recovered from Elan Bank, Kerguelen Plateau (ODP Leg 183, Site 1137). Journal of Petrology, 43, 1241–1257.

Irvine, T.N.J., Baragar, W.R.A., 1971. A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks. Canadian J. Earth Sci. 8, 523–548.

Jensen, L.S., 1976. A new cation plot for classifying sub-alkaline volcanic rocks. Ontario Division of Mines Misc. Pap 66, 21p.

Kent, R.W., Saunders, A.D., Kempton, P.D., Ghose, N.C., 1997. Rajmahal basalts, eastern India: mantle source and melt distribution at a volcanic rifted margin. In: Mahoney, J.T., Coffin, M.F. (Eds.), Large Igneous Provinces – Continental, Oceanic and Planetary Flood Volcanism. Geophysical Monograph Series 100, pp. 145-182.

Kent, R.W., Kelley, S.P. and Pringle, M.S., 1998. Mineralogy and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of orangeites (Group II kimberlites) from the Damodar Valley, eastern India. Mineralogical Magazine, 62, 313–323.

Kent, R.W., Pringle, M.S., Müller, R.D., Saunders, A.D., Ghose, N.C., 2002. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Rajmahal basalts, India, and their relationship to the Kerguelen Plateau. J. Petrol. 43, 1141–1153.

Kumar, A., Ahmad, T., 2007. Geochemistry of mafic dykes in part of Chotanagpur gneissic complex: Petrogenetic and tectonic implications: Geochem. J. 41, 173–186.

Le Maitre, R.W., 2002. Igneous Rocks: A classification and glossary of terms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Liu, Z., Zhou, Q., Lai, Y., Qing, C., Li, Y., Wu, J. and Xia, X., 2015. Petrogenesis of the Early Cretaceous Laguila bimodal intrusive rocks from the Tethyan Himalaya: Implications for the break-up of Eastern Gondwana. Lithos, 236–237, 190-202.

Mahadevan, T.M., 2002. Geology of Bihar and Jharkhand. Geological Society of India, Bangalore.

Mahoney, J.J., Jones, W.B., Frey, F.A., Salters, V.J.M., Pyle, D.G., Davies, H.L., 1995. Geochemical characteristics of lavas from Broken Ridge, the Naturaliste Plaleau and southernmost Kerguelen Plateau: Cretaceous plateau volcanism in the southeast Indian ocean. Chem. Geol. 120, 315–345.

McDonough, W.F., Sun, S-.S., Ringwood, A.E., Jagoutz, E., Hofmann, A.W., 1992. K, Rb and Cs in the earth and moon and the evolution of the earth’s mantle. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 1001–1012.

Melluso, L., Srivastava R.K., Petrone, C.M., Guarino, V. and Sinha, A.K., 2012. Mineralogy and magmatic affinity of the Jasra Intrusive Complex, Shillong Plateau, India. Mineralogical Magazine, 76, 1099–1117.

Mukhopadhyay, D., 1988. Precambrian of the eastern Indian shield. Geological Society of India Memoir 8, Bangalore.

Naqvi, S.M., Rogers, J.J.W., 1987. Precambrian Geology of India. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics 6.

Neumann, E.-R., Svensen, H., Galerne, C.Y., Planke, S., 2011. Multistage evolution of dolerites in the Karoo Large Igneous Province, Central South Africa. J. Petrol. 52, 959–984.

Olierook, H.K.H., Merle, R.E., Jourdan, F., 2017. Toward a Greater Kerguelen large igneous province: Evolving mantle source contributions in and around the Indian Ocean. Lithos 282–283, 163–172.

Olierook, H.K.H., Jourdan, F., Merle, R.E., Timms, N.E., Kusznir, N.J. and Muhling, J., 2016. Bunbury Basalt: Gondwana breakup products or earliest vestiges of the Kerguelen mantle plume? Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 440, 20-32.

Olierook, H.K.H., Jiang, Q., Jourdan, F., Chiaradia, M., 2019. Greater Kerguelen large igneous province reveals no role for Kerguelen mantle plume in the continental breakup of eastern Gondwana. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 511, 244–255.

Patrick, M.R., Smellie, J.L., 2013. Synthesis: A spaceborne inventory of volcanic activity in Antarctica and southern oceans, 2000–10. Antarctic Sci. 25, 475–500.

Paul, D.K., 2005. Petrology and geochemistry of the Salma dyke, Raniganj coalfield (Lower Gondwana), eastern India: Linkage with Rajmahal or Deccan volcanic activity? J. Asian Earth Sci. 25, 903–913.

Pearce, J.A., 2008. Geochemical fingerprinting of oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite classification and the search for Archean oceanic crust. Lithos 100, 14–48.

Pearce, J.A., Ernst, R.E., Peate, D.W., Rogers, C., 2021. LIP printing: use of immobile element proxies to characterize Large Igneous Provinces in the geologic record. Lithos 392-393, 106068; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106068

Pringle, M.S., Storey, M. and Wijbans, J., 1994. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of Mid-Cretaceous Indian Ocean basalts: constraints on the origin of large flood basalt provinces. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union, 75 (abstract).

Ramakrishnan, M., Vaidyanadhan, R., 2010. Geology of India. Geological Society of India, Bangalore.Ray, J.S., Pande, K., 2001. 40Ar-39Ar age of carbonatite-alkaline magmatism in Sung valley, Meghalaya, India. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 110, 185-190.

Ray, J.S. and Pande, K., 2001. 40Ar-39Ar age of carbonatite-alkaline magmatism in Sung valley, Meghalaya, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 110, 185-190.

Ray, J.S., Pattanayak, S.K., Pande, K., 2005. Rapid emplacement of the Kerguelen plume–related Sylhet Traps, eastern India: Evidence from 40Ar-39Ar geochronology. Geoph. Res. Lett. 32, 10, L10303, doi:10.1029/2005GL022586

Salters, V.J.M., Storey, M., Sevigny, J.H., Whitechurch, H., 1992. Trace element and isotope characteristics of Kerguelen Plateau region. Proc. Ocean Drill. Prog. Scie. Results 120, 55–62.

Samal, A.K., Srivastava, R.K., Ernst, R.E., Söderlund, U., 2019. Neoarchean-Mesoproterozoic mafic dyke swarms of the Indian Shield mapped using Google™ Earth images and ArcGIS™, and links with Large Igneous Provinces. In: Srivastava, R.K., Ernst, R.R., Peng, P. (Eds.), Dyke Swarms of the World: A modern perspective. Springer, Singapore, pp. 335-390.

Samal, A.K., Srivastava, R.K., Ernst, R.E., 2021. An appraisal of mineral systems associated with Precambrian Large Igneous Provinces of the Indian Shield. Ore Geol. Rev. 131, 104009; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104009

Sarkar, A., Datta, A.K., Poddar, B.K., Bhattacharyya, B.K., Kollapuri, V.K. and Sanwal, R., 1996. Geochronological studies of Mesozoic igneous rocks from eastern India. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences, 13, 77–81.

Schilling, J.-G., 1973. Iceland mantle plume: geochemical evidence along Reykjanes Ridge. Nature 242, 565–571.

Sharma, R.S., 2009. Cratons and Fold Belts of India. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Shi, Y., Hou, C., Anderson, J.L., Yang, T., Ma, Y., Bian, W. and Jin, J., 2018. Zircon SHRIMP U–Pb age of Late Jurassic OIB-type volcanic rocks from the Tethyan Himalaya: constraints on the initial activity time of the Kerguelen mantle plume. Acta Geochimica, 37, 441-455.

Singh, A. K., Chung, S. L., Bikramaditya, R. K., Lee, H. Y., Khogenkumar, S., 2020. Zircon U-Pb geochronology, Hf isotopic compositions and Petrogenetic study of Abor volcanic rocks of Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis, Northeast India: Implications for eruption during breakup of Eastern Gondwana. Geol. J. 55, 1227–1244.

Singh, A. K., Oinam, G., Chung, S. -L., Bikramaditya, R. K., Lee, H. -Y., Joshi, M., 2021. Magmatism in the Siang Window of Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis, Northeast India: Vestige of the Kerguelen mantle plume activity. In: Srivastava, R.K., Ernst, R.E., Buchan, K.L., De Kock, M. (Eds.), Large igneous provinces and their plumbing systems. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 518, 301-323.

Srivastava, R.K., 2020a. Early Cretaceous alkaline/ultra-alkaline and carbonatite magmatism in the Indian Shield – a review: implications for a possible remnant of the Greater Kerguelen large igneous provinces. Episodes 43, 300-311.

Srivastava, R.K., 2020b. Large igneous provinces of the Indian Shield and the Himalayan terrain in space and time. J. Indian Geol. Cong., 12, 5-24.

Srivastava, R.K., 2022. Early Cretaceous Greater Kerguelen large igneous province and its plumbing systems: a contemplation on concurrent magmatic records of the eastern Indian Shield and adjoining regions. Geol. J. 57, 681-693; DOI: 10.1002/gj.4239

Srivastava, R.K., Heaman, L.M., Sinha, A.K. and Shihua, S., 2005. Emplacement age and isotope geochemistry of Sung Valley alkaline–carbonatite complex, Shillong Plateau, northeastern India: implications for primary carbonate melt and genesis of the associated silicate rocks. Lithos, 81, 33-54.

Srivastava, R.K., Chalapathi Rao, N.V., Sinha, A.K., 2009. Cretaceous potassic intrusives with affinities to aillikites from Jharia area: Magmatic expression of metasomatically veined and thinned lithospheric beneath Singhbhum craton, eastern India. Lithos 112, 407–418.

Srivastava, R.K., Sinha, A.K., Kumar, S., 2012. Geochemical characteristics of Mesoproterozoic metabasite dykes from the Chhotanagpur gneissic terrain, eastern India: Implications for their emplacement in a plate margin tectonic environment. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 121, 509–523.

Srivastava, R.K., Kumar, S., Sinha, A.K., Chalapathi Rao, N.V., 2014. Petrology and geochemistry of high-titanium and low-titanium mafic dykes from the Damodar valley, Chhotanagpur Gneissic Terrain, eastern India and their relation to mantle plume(s). J. Asian Earth Sci. 84, 34–50.

Srivastava, R.K., Guarino, V., Wu, F.-Y., Melluso, L., Sinha, A.K., 2019. Evidence of sub-continental lithospheric mantle sources and open system crystallization processes from in-situ U-Pb ages and Nd-Sr-Hf isotope geochemistry of the Cretaceous ultramafic-alkaline-(carbonatite) intrusions from the Shillong Plateau, northeastern India. Lithos 330–331, 108–119.

Srivastava, R.K., Wang, F., Shi, W., Sinha, A.K., Buchan, K.L., 2020. The nature of Cretaceous dolerite dykes of two distinct trends in the Damodar Valley, eastern India: Constraints on their linkage to mantle plumes and large igneous provinces from 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and geochemistry. Lithosphere 12, 40–52.

Srivastava, R.K., Ernst, R.E., Buchan, K.L., de Kock, M., 2022. Large Igneous Provinces and their Plumbing Systems. Geol. Soc., London, Spec. Publ. 518.

Srivastava, R.K., Wang, F., Shi, W. and Ernst, R.E., 2023. Early Cretaceous mafic dykes from the Chhota Nagpur Gneissic Terrane, eastern India: evidence of multiple magma pulses for the main stage of the Greater Kerguelen mantle plume. J. Asian Earth Sci., 241, 105464; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105464

Storey, M., Kent, R.W., Saunders, A.D., Salters, V.J., Hergt, J., Whitechurc, H., Sevigny, J.H., Thirlwall, M.F., Leat, P., Ghose, N.C., Gifford, M., 1992. Lower Cretaceous rocks in continental margins and their relationship to the Kerguelen Plateau. Proc. Ocean Drill. Prog. Scient. Results 120, 33–53.

Tian, Y., Gong, J., Chen, H., Guo, L., Xu, Q., Chen, L., Lin, X., Cheng, X., Yang, R., Zhao, L. and Yang, S., 2019. Early Cretaceous bimodal magmatism in the eastern Tethyan Himalayas, Tibet: Indicative of records on precursory continental rifting and initial breakup of eastern Gondwana. Lithos, 324-325, 699-715.

Wang, Y.Y., Zeng, L., Asimow, P.D., Gao, L.-E., Ma, C., Antoshechkina, P.M., Guo, C., Hou, K. and Tang, S., 2018. Early Cretaceous high-Ti and low-Ti mafic magmatism in Southeastern Tibet: Insights into magmatic evolution of the Comei Large Igneous Province. Lithos, 296-299, 396-411.

Watson, S.J., Whittaker, J.M., Halpin, J.A., Williams, S.E., Milan, L.A., Daczko, N.R. and Wyman, D.A., 2016. Tectonic drivers and the influence of the Kerguelen plume on seafloor spreading during formation of the early Indian Ocean. Gondwana Research, 35, 97–114.

Wei, Y., Liang, W., Shang, Y., Zhang, B. and Pan, W., 2017. Petrogenesis and tectonic implications of ∼130 Ma diabase dikes in the western Tethyan Himalaya (western Tibet). Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 143, 236-248.

Weis, D., Frey, F.A., Schlich, R., Schaming, M., Montigny, R., Damasceno, D., Mattielli, N., Nicolaysen, K.E., Scoates, J.S., 2002. Trace of the Kerguelen mantle plume: Evidence from seamounts between the Kerguelen Archipelago and Heard Island, Indian Ocean. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 3, 1–27.

Whittaker, J.M., Williams, S.E. and Müller, R.D., 2013. Revised tectonic evolution of the Eastern Indian Ocean. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems,14, 1891–1909.

Whittaker, J.M., Williams, S.E., Halpin, J.A., Wild, T.J., Stilwell, J.D., Jourdan, F., Daczko, N.R., 2016. Eastern Indian Ocean microcontinent formation driven by plate motion changes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 454, 203–212.

Yang, H.-J., Frey, F.A., Weis, D., Giret, A., Pyle, D.G., Michon, G., 1998. Petrogenesis of the flood basalts forming the Northern Kerguelen archipelago: implications for the Kerguelen Plume. J. Petrol. 39, 711–748.

Yaxley, G.M., Kamenetsky, V.S., Nichols, T., Maas, R., Belousova, E., Rosenthal, A. and Norman, M., 2013. The discovery of kimberlites in Antarctica extends the vast Gondwana Cretaceous province. Nature Communications, 4, 2921; doi: 10.1038/ncomms3921

Zeng, Y.-C., Xu, J.-F., Chen, J.-L., Wang, B.-D., Huang, F., Yu, H.-X., Chen, X.-F. and Zhao, P.-P., 2019. Breakup of Eastern Gondwana as inferred from the Lower Cretaceous Charong Dolerites in the central Tethyan Himalaya, southern Tibet. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 515, 70-82.

Zhou, Q., Liu, Z., Lai, Y., Wang, G.-C., Liao, Z., Li, Y.-X., Wu, J.-Y., Wang, S. and Qing, C.-S., 2018. Petrogenesis of mafic and felsic rocks from the Comei large igneous province, South Tibet: Implications for the initial activity of the Kerguelen plume. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 130, 811-824.

Zhu, D., Mo, X., Pan, G., Zhao, Z., Dong, G., Shi, Y., Liao, Z., Wang, L., Zhou, C., 2008. Petrogenesis of the earliest Early Cretaceous mafic rocks from the Cona area of the eastern Tethyan Himalaya in south Tibet: Interaction between the incubating Kerguelen plume and the eastern Greater India lithosphere? Lithos 100, 147–173.

Zhu, D.-C., Chung, S.-L., Mo, X.-X., Zhao, Z.-D., Niu, Y., Song, B., Yang, Y.-H., 2009. The 132 Ma Comei-Bunbury large igneous province: remnants identified in present-day southeastern Tibet and southwestern Australia. Geology 37, 583–586.