April 2012 LIP of the Month

Abor Volcanics, northeast India

Diane Chung & Jason R. Ali*
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China
* Email: jrali@hku.hk

Abor volcanics – key information

The Abor Volcanics comprise a series of tholeiitic to alkaline basalts (Singh, 2007), that are exposed in the Siang “window” in Arunachal Pradesh, NE India. The unit, which is up to 1500 m thick (Bhat, 1984; Singh, 2007), sits a short distance south of the eastern Himalayan Syntaxis (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Simplified geological map of the Siang “window’’ showing the outcrop of the Abor Volcanics (shown in gray – based on Acharyya, 2007). Circled numbers, 1–8, are the exposures sampled in the paleomagnetic investigation of Ali et al. (2012). Abbreviations for large villages and small towns: B = Boleng, D = Dalbuing, P = Pangin, R = Rotung, Y = Yinkiong; abbreviations for structures: MCT = Main Central Thrust, MBT = Main Boundary Thrust, NPT = North Pasighat Thrust.

The volcanic succession forms part of the Lesser Himalayan sequence (Figs 2 and 3), the southernmost of three major thrust-bounded litho-tectonic packages that formed the northern part of the Indian craton prior to their structural disruption following the sub-continent’s collision with Asia in the mid-Cenozoic (Aitchison et al., 2007).

Figure 2. Distribution of the Abor Volcanic together with several other northern Indian Permian mafic magmatic suites that are exposed in the Himalayan range (from Ali et al., 2012). Note the structural positions of each formation.

Figure 3. Schematic cross section from southern Tibet across the Himalaya (from Ali et al., 2012). Abbreviations: MBT, Main Boundary Thrust; MCT,

Main Central Thrust; STDF, Southern Tibet detachment fault; YTS, Yarlung Tsangpo suture. Of particular importance are the structural sites of the various mafic suites.

Abor Volcanics age-dating controversy

Over the last decade or so, controversy has arisen concerning the age of the Abor Volcanics. Traditionally, the formation was viewed as being Late Paleozoic in age, with some consensus on Late Carboniferous-Early Permian. In recent years, however, S.K. Acharyya and colleagues have argued for the unit being erupted in the Early Eocene (for a full account, see Ali et al., 2012, p. 105). Critically, though, the basalt geochemistry underpins two very different models, the first related to the eastern Gondwana’s Late Paleozoic break-up (e.g. Sinha Roy & Furnes, 1978; Bhat, 1984; Garzanti et al., 1999; Chauvet et al., 2008), the second the India–Asia collision system in the early Paleogene (e.g. Sengupta et al., 1996; Acharyya & Sengupta, 1998; Acharyya, 1999, 2001, 2007).

Interestingly, two recent works have been published that are relevant to the Abor series’ age-assignment debate. Kesari (2010) argues that the suite represents two discrete magmatic episodes: an Early Permian one is considered equivalent to a nearby unit called the Lichi Volcanics; a second dates from the Early Eocene and sees the ‘‘Abor Volcanics’’ sitting within the Yongkiang Group. Unfortunately, the accompanying geological map has a scale of 1:2,000,000, thus it is difficult to visualize the detailed geographical distributions and field relations of the two packages. In a second investigation, as part of a multi-disciplinary study, Liebke et al. (2011) generated various types of radiometric data: K–Ar whole-rock on five basalt specimens and two samples from an overlying clastic unit (Yinkiong Formation shales) together with low-temperature fission track and (U–Th)/He analyses of zircons extracted from the bounding sedimentary packages. Unfortunately, the results were somewhat ambiguous, and the Late Paleozoic versus early Cenozoic age debate was thus left unresolved.

Towards a resolution of the age-dating issue

Ali et al. (2012) adopted a different approach to the age-dating problem. Based on paleomagnetism theory, they argued that if a primary remanance could be recovered from the Abor Volcanics, because the Indian block was in very different positions in the Late Paleozoic (mid-latitude Southern Hemisphere) and Cenozoic (equatorial) the magnetizations should reflect this (Fig. 4). In total, 34 cooling-unit directions were obtained (from eight exposures), with the mean inclination being 72.7° (a95 = 6.2°, k = 18.3), which equates to a formation latitude of 58.1°S (if the magnetization had been acquired in the Ypresian, the inclination would have been appreciably shallower, 5–10°). This provides compelling evidence supporting the notion that the series is of Late Paleozoic age (and combined with various other arguments, Early Permian). As Ali et al. (2012) pointed out, though, the studied sections are all from the lower Siang River basin, thus it is possible that Eocene volcanic rocks are present elsewhere in the Siang window.

Figure 4. Greater India block in the mid-Early Permian (~280 Ma) and the late Early Eocene (~50 Ma), as well as the Indian craton today. Also depicted are the Abor Volcanics at the various times. The schematic diagrams on the right-hand side show the expected magnetization directions if the remanence is primary and dates from the Early Permian or Early Eocene, or is a recent overprint; black/white arrows indicate normal/reverse polarity.

Geodynamic Implications

Based on a Late Paleozoic age assignment, several workers have correlated the Abor Volcanics with broadly coeval mafic volcanic suites in Oman, NE Pakistan–NW India and southern Tibet–Nepal, which developed in response to the Cimmerian block peeling-off eastern Gondwana in the Early-Middle Permian. There is, however, a problem with relating the Abor Volcanics (as well as a suite in southern Sikkim, Fig. 2) to the rifting of the Cimmerian terrane. The other bodies form part of the Himalayan Tethys sequence (Fig. 3), and were thus erupted close to the Indian block’s northern edge. There, the volcanics are covered by a relatively complete sequence of Mesozoic shelf deposits. In contrast the series at Abor and Sikkim are part of the Lesser Himalayan sequence and would have thus sat a considerable distance inboard from the Indian block’s ‘‘northern’’ edge (Fig. 3). This probably explains why the stratigraphic record at those locations is very different to that of the Tethyan Himalayas; above the Permian Abor Volcanics the next youngest clearly mappable unit is the Yinkiong Formation, from which Middle Eocene marine fossils have been reported (e.g., Singh & Singh, 1983; Tripathi & Mamgain, 1986; Sengupta et al., 1996). A relatively recent evaluation of Greater India’s size, shape and pre-breakout position within Gondwana (Ali & Aitchison, 2005) suggests that the Abor and Sikkim eruptions would have been 1400–1500 km south of the rifting zone, which had to run north of the continental basement forming the Wallaby and Zenith plateaus west of Australia (Fig. 5; Colwell et al., 1994; Stilwell et al., 2012). As a consequence, we suggest that the Abor Volcanics in the lower Siang River result from the approximately coeval rifting that was also taking place between India/Antarctica and India/Australia, for example, Veevers & Tewari (1995), Harrowfield et al. (2005), and Veevers (2006), as well as extension within the Indian craton (Ghosh et al., 2012) (Fig. 13). Extension in these areas terminated soon afterwards, but 120-plus million years later on in the Early Cretaceous some of the rifting loci formed the break-up margins between eastern India and eastern Antarctica, and northern Greater India and western Australia (e.g. Ali & Aitchison, 2008).

Figure 5. Gondwana in the late Early Permian, ~280 Ma. The image shows the paleopositions of the various Early/Middle Permian mafic volcanic formations that formed on northern India (see Figs 2 and 3). As a consequence of the substantial N–S shortening in the northern Greater India ‘‘cover’’ sequences, the arrows associated with the Tethyan Himalayan Panjal Traps, Nar Tsum Spilites and Bhote Khosi Basalts, indicate the lines along which the volcanic rocks likely erupted. In contrast, with the Abor and Sikkim volcanics being part of the lesser Himalaya, they would not have been transported as far relative to the Indian craton (Fig. 2 and 3). Note that the Cimmerian terrane had probably fully detached from eastern Gondwana before the end of the Middle Permian (Stampfli & Borel, 2002, figure 6); prior to this, its eastern end was separated from northern Australia by blocks that rifted from the latter in the Middle to Late Jurassic (Hall, 2011; Metcalfe, 2011). Like Stampfli & Borel, we interpret Cimmeria to have included the southern Qiangtang and Lhasa blocks (compare the alternative views of Metcalfe, 1996; Yin & Harrison, 2000). Abbreviations: E, W and Z respectively refer to the Exmouth, Wallaby and Zenith plateaus that sit to the W and NW of Australia. Regarding the latter two, they have been restored to accommodate extension associated with the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous rifting that affected western Australia.


Research Grants to JRA (CERG – HKU7002/05, HKU7001/10) partially supported the fieldwork and laboratory studies. We thank Jonathan Aitchison, Alan Baxter, Scott Bryan and Sam Chik for discussions and insights.


Acharyya, S.K., 1999. The role of India-Asia Collision in the amalgamation of the Gondwana-derived blocks and deep-seated magmatism during the Paleogene at the Himalayan foreland basin and around the Gongha Syntaxis in the South China Block. Gondwana Research 2, 510–512.

Acharyya, S.K., 2001. The role of India-Asia collision in the amalgamation of the Gondwana-derived blocks and deep-seated magmatism during the Paleogene at the Himalayan foreland basin and around the Gongha Syntaxis in the South China Block. Gondwana Research 4, 61–74.

Acharyya, S.K., 2007. Evolution of the Himalayan Paleogene foreland basin, influence of its litho-packet on the formation of thrust related domes and windows in the eastern Himalayas – a review. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 31, 1–17.

Acharyya, S.K., Sengupta, S., 1998. The structure of the Siang window, its evolution and bearing on the nature of eastern syntaxis of the Himalaya. (Indian) National Academy of Science Letters 21, 177–192.

Aitchison, J.C., Ali, J.R., Davis, A.M., 2007. When and where did India and Asia collide? Journal of Geophysical Research 112B, doi:10.029/2006JB004706.

Ali, J.R., Aitchison, J.C., 2005. Greater India. Earth-Science Reviews 72, 169–188.

Ali, J.R., Aitchison, J.C., 2008. Gondwana to Asia: plate tectonics, paleogeography and the biological connectivity of the Indian sub-continent from the Middle Jurassic through end Eocene (166–35 Ma). Earth-Science Reviews 88, 145–166.

Ali, J.R., Aitchison, J.C., Chik, S.Y.S., Baxter, A.T., Bryan, S.E., 2012. Paleomagnetic data support Early Permian age for the Abor Volcanics in the lower Siang Valley, NE India: significance for Gondwana-related break-up models. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 50, 105–115.

Bhat, M.I., 1984. Abor volcanics: further evidence for the birth of the Tethys Ocean in the Himalayan segment. Journal of the Geological Society of London 141, 763–775.

Chauvet, F., Lapierre, H. Bosch, D., Guillot,S. Mascle, G. Vannay, J.C., Cotten,J., Brunet,P., Keller, F., 2008. Geochemistry of the Panjal Traps basalts (NW Himalaya): records of the Pangea Permian break-up. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France 179, 383–395.

Colwell, J.B., Symonds, P.A., Crawford, A.J., 1994. The nature of the Wallaby (Cuvier) Plateau and other igneous provinces of the west Australian margin, AGSO Journal of  Australian Geology and Geophysics 15, 137–156.

Garzanti, E., Le Fort, P., Sciunnach, D., 1999. First report of Lower Permian basalts in South Tibet: tholeiitic magmatism during break-up and incipient opening of Neotethys. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 17, 533–546.

Ghosh, S., Sarkar, S., Ghosh, P., 2012. Petrography and major element geochemistry of the Permo-Triassic sandstones, central India: Implications for provenance in an intracratonic pull-apart basin. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 43, 207–240.

Hall, R., 2011. Australia–SE Asia collision: plate tectonics and crustal flow. In Hall, R., Cottam, M.A. & Wilson, M.E.J. (eds) The SE Asian Gateway: History and Tectonics of the Australia–Asia Collision. Geological Society of London Special Publication, 355, 75–109.

Harrowfield, M., Holdgate, G.R., Wilson, C.J.L., McLoughlin, S., 2005. Tectonic significance of the Lambert Graben, East Antarctica: reconstructing the Gondwanan rift. Geology 33, 197–200.

Kesari, G.K., 2010. Geology and Mineral Resources of Arunachal Pradesh, Geological Survey of India Miscellaneous Publication, Volume 30 Part IV vol I (i) Arunachal Pradesh: Guwhati, Geological Survey of India, p. 54.

Liebke, U., Antolin, B., Appel, E., Basavaiah, N., Mikes, T., Dunkl, I., Wemmer, K., 2011, Indication for clockwise rotation in the Siang window south of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and new geochronological constraints for the area. In: Gloaguen, R. & Ratschbacher, L. (eds) Growth and Collapse of the Tibetan Plateau. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 353, 71–97.

Metcalfe, I., 1996. Pre-Cretaceous evolution of SE Asian terranes. In: Hall, R., Blundell, D.J. (Eds.) Tectonic evolution of SE Asia. Geological Society of London Special Publication No. 106, 97–122.

Metcalfe, I., 2011. Palaeozoic-Mesozoic History of SE Asia. In Hall, R., Cottam, M.A. & Wilson, M.E J. (eds) The SE Asian Gateway: History and Tectonics of the Australia–Asia Collision. Geological Society of London Special Publication, 355, 7–35.

Sengupta, S., Acharyya, S.K., de Smeth, J.B., 1996. Geochemical characteristics of the Abor volcanic rocks, N.E. Himalaya, India: nature and Early Eocene magmatism. Journal of the Geological Society of London 153, 695–704.

Singh, A.K., 2007. Chemical characteristics of alkaline basalt from the Abor volcanics of Arunachal Himalaya. Journal of Geological Society of India 69, 1189-1194.

Singh, T., Singh, P., 1983. Late Early Eocene larger foraminiferids from Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India and their geological significance. Geoscience Journal 4, 141–156.

Sinha Roy, S., Furnes, H., 1978. Geochemistry and geotectonic implication of basic volcanic rocks in the Lower Gondwana sequence (Upper Palaeozoic) of the Sikkim Himalayas. Geological Magazine 115, 427–436.

Stampfli, G.M., Borel, G.D., 2002. A plate tectonic model for the Paleozoic and Mesozoic constrained by dynamic plate boundaries and restored synthetic oceanic isochrons. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 196, 17–33.

Stilwell, J.D., Quilty, P.G., Mantle, D.J., 2012. Paleontology of Early Cretaceous deep-water samples dredged from the Wallaby Plateau: new perspectives of Gondwana break-up along the Western Australian margin. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 59, 29–49.

Tripathi, C., Mamgain, V.D., 1986. The larger foraminifera from the Yinkiong Formation (Early Eocene) of east Siang district, Arunuchal Pradesh. Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India 31, 76–84.

Veevers, J.J., 2006. Updated Gondwana (Permian–Cretaceous) earth history of Australia. Gondwana Research 9, 231–260.

Veevers, J.J., Tewari, R.C., 1995. Permian– Carboniferous and Permian–Triassic magmatism in the rift zone bordering the Tethyan margin of southern Pangea. Geology 23, 467–470.

Yin, A., Harrison, T.M., 2000. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogen. Annual Reviews of Earth Planetary Science 28, 211–280.